From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 427ECCA9EA0 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 09:58:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E66222BD for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 09:58:12 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org F3E66222BD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dev-bounces@dpdk.org Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8AF21C1FC; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 11:58:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AE1A1C11C; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 11:58:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC0E98AC700; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 09:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dmarchan.remote.csb (ovpn-204-29.brq.redhat.com [10.40.204.29]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5595760BF1; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 09:58:08 +0000 (UTC) From: David Marchand To: dev@dpdk.org Cc: stable@dpdk.org, Honnappa Nagarahalli Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 11:57:53 +0200 Message-Id: <1571392673-27643-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20191008211220.31586-1-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> References: <20191008211220.31586-1-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.69]); Fri, 18 Oct 2019 09:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] rcu: fix reference to offline function X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Fixes: 64994b56cfd7 ("rcu: add RCU library supporting QSBR mechanism") Cc: stable@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: David Marchand --- I intend to add this patch to this series. Honnappa, can you review it please ? --- lib/librte_rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.h b/lib/librte_rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.h index 0d46645..0b55859 100644 --- a/lib/librte_rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.h +++ b/lib/librte_rcu/rte_rcu_qsbr.h @@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ struct rte_rcu_qsbr { * call this API before calling rte_rcu_qsbr_quiescent. This can be called * during initialization or as part of the packet processing loop. * - * The reader thread must call rte_rcu_thread_offline API, before + * The reader thread must call rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_offline API, before * calling any functions that block, to ensure that rte_rcu_qsbr_check * API does not wait indefinitely for the reader thread to update its QS. * @@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ struct rte_rcu_qsbr { * This can be called during initialization or as part of the packet * processing loop. * - * The reader thread must call rte_rcu_thread_offline API, before + * The reader thread must call rte_rcu_qsbr_thread_offline API, before * calling any functions that block, to ensure that rte_rcu_qsbr_check * API does not wait indefinitely for the reader thread to update its QS. * -- 1.8.3.1