From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] testpmd: handle all rxqs in rss setup Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 11:42:11 +0200 Message-ID: <1591071.TKkbpo8ne8@xps13> References: <1462488421-118990-1-git-send-email-zhihong.wang@intel.com> <1462488421-118990-5-git-send-email-zhihong.wang@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com To: Zhihong Wang Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com (mail-wm0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66F3377C for ; Wed, 25 May 2016 11:42:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id z87so55070730wmh.0 for ; Wed, 25 May 2016 02:42:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1462488421-118990-5-git-send-email-zhihong.wang@intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-05-05 18:46, Zhihong Wang: > This patch removes constraints in rxq handling when multiqueue is enabled > to handle all the rxqs. > > Current testpmd forces a dedicated core for each rxq, some rxqs may be > ignored when core number is less than rxq number, and that causes confusion > and inconvenience. I have the feeling that "constraints", "confusion" and "inconvenience" should be more explained. Please give some examples with not enough and too much cores. Thanks