From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Provide reasonable default to -n Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 17:50:20 +0100 Message-ID: <1607217.6S7yYligGL@xps13> References: <561F9DD4.3070906@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: "Mcnamara, John" , Panu Matilainen Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E978D8B for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 17:51:29 +0100 (CET) Received: by wicll6 with SMTP id ll6so123611862wic.1 for ; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 09:51:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2015-10-15 13:12, Mcnamara, John: > From: Panu Matilainen [mailto:pmatilai@redhat.com] > > Sure. I was planning on going through the docs and updating them > > (separately) if the change is otherwise accepted, I suspect there are more > > than those two places needing changes. Actually the docs about command line are redundant and outdated. We should try to keep them only in the startup section of the GSG (Linux and BSD). > I counted ~ 100 places in the docs where -n is used. I don't know if they all > have to be removed. The 2 examples I gave were the only ones that I found, > in a quick scan, that explicitly say -n is required. The rest are in the > "mostly harmless" category but if you wanted to remove the majority of the > references then that is probably okay. I think we should remove most of them to keep the doc simple and maintainable. These patches will be applied even if the doc is not updated because a doc rework is needed.