From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACF33C433ED for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 07:00:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 427666140A for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 07:00:29 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 427666140A Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=huawei.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dev-bounces@dpdk.org Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFCD141987; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 09:00:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com (szxga06-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.32]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86AD24195D for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 09:00:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from DGGEMS412-HUB.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.58]) by szxga06-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FQBGJ3X6BzklBr; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 14:58:16 +0800 (CST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.69.192.56) by DGGEMS412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.212) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.498.0; Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:00:09 +0800 From: "Min Hu (Connor)" To: CC: , , , , Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 15:00:20 +0800 Message-ID: <1618988423-5034-1-git-send-email-humin29@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 In-Reply-To: <1616830818-3127-1-git-send-email-humin29@huawei.com> References: <1616830818-3127-1-git-send-email-humin29@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Originating-IP: [10.69.192.56] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] fix check of port and core X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Currently, some examples check that the port is on the same NUMA node as the polling thread for best performance. The method is to compare the socket id of port and that of current core. If the result is different, warning info will be given. But it ignores the port which is from numa node 0, that is, no warning info will be given if the port is from numa node 0, and this set of patches will fix it. --- v2: * add more commit info. Min Hu (Connor) (3): examples/flow_classify: fix check of port and core examples/l2fwd-cat: fix check of port and core examples/skeleton: fix check of port and core examples/flow_classify/flow_classify.c | 2 +- examples/l2fwd-cat/l2fwd-cat.c | 2 +- examples/skeleton/basicfwd.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) -- 2.7.4