From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A5A9C4338F for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 16:52:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C11660F57 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 16:52:12 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 1C11660F57 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dpdk.org Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C0334128D; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 18:51:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga14.intel.com (mga14.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AABC41279 for ; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 18:51:38 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10075"; a="215320197" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,319,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="215320197" Received: from fmsmga008.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.58]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Aug 2021 09:51:37 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.84,319,1620716400"; d="scan'208";a="486025116" Received: from unknown (HELO icx-npg-scs1-cp1.localdomain) ([10.233.180.245]) by fmsmga008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Aug 2021 09:51:37 -0700 From: Nicolas Chautru To: dev@dpdk.org, gakhil@marvell.com Cc: thomas@monjalon.net, trix@redhat.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, mingshan.zhang@intel.com, Nicolas Chautru Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 09:51:25 -0700 Message-Id: <1628873485-30596-7-git-send-email-nicolas.chautru@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1628873485-30596-1-git-send-email-nicolas.chautru@intel.com> References: <1628873485-30596-1-git-send-email-nicolas.chautru@intel.com> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 6/6] bbdev: reduce warning level for one scenario X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Queue setup may genuinely fail when adding incremental queues for a given priority level. In that case application would attempt to configure a queue at a different priority level. Not an actual error. Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru --- lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev.c b/lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev.c index fc37236..defddcf 100644 --- a/lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev.c +++ b/lib/bbdev/rte_bbdev.c @@ -528,9 +528,10 @@ struct rte_bbdev * ret = dev->dev_ops->queue_setup(dev, queue_id, (conf != NULL) ? conf : &dev_info.default_queue_conf); if (ret < 0) { - rte_bbdev_log(ERR, - "Device %u queue %u setup failed", dev_id, - queue_id); + /* This may happen when trying different priority levels */ + rte_bbdev_log(INFO, + "Device %u queue %u setup failed", + dev_id, queue_id); return ret; } -- 1.8.3.1