From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 5/5] pmdinfo.py: Add tool to query binaries for hw and other support information Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 20:58:18 +0200 Message-ID: <1653357.fSAMoabLvC@xps13> References: <1463431287-4551-1-git-send-email-nhorman@tuxdriver.com> <1484190.9fzbW2DJJe@xps13> <20160525174721.GE14322@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Bruce Richardson , Stephen Hemminger , Panu Matilainen To: Neil Horman Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com (mail-wm0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859753239 for ; Wed, 25 May 2016 20:58:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id a136so140891203wme.0 for ; Wed, 25 May 2016 11:58:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160525174721.GE14322@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-05-25 13:47, Neil Horman: > On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 07:22:39PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 2016-05-24 15:41, Neil Horman: > > > Note that, in the case of dynamically linked applications, pmdinfo.py will scan > > > for implicitly linked PMDs by searching the specified binaries .dynamic section > > > for DT_NEEDED entries that contain the substring librte_pmd. > > > > I don't know any DPDK app dynamically linked with a PMD (with DT_NEEDED). > I know lots of them, they're all in the dpdk. everything under app that uses a > virutal device links at link time to librte_pmd_bonding and librte_pmd_pipe (and > a few others), because they have additional apis that they need to resolve at > load time. Oh yes! you are right. > > However it is a good idea to handle this case. > > But relying on the name assumption "librte_pmd" is really weak. > > > > > + $(Q)$(call rte_symlink, $(DESTDIR)$(datadir)/tools/pmdinfo.py, \ > > > + $(DESTDIR)$(bindir)/pmdinfo) > > > > I think we must prefix the tool name with dpdk. > > What about dpdk-objinfo or dpdk-pmdinfo? > > > > > +from elftools.elf.elffile import ELFFile > > > +from elftools.elf.dynamic import DynamicSection, DynamicSegment > > > +from elftools.elf.enums import ENUM_D_TAG > > > +from elftools.elf.segments import InterpSegment > > > +from elftools.elf.sections import SymbolTableSection > > > > Should it be possible to implement pmdinfogen with this > > Python library? > > > Sure, but that really doesn't buy us anything, as its already implemented in C. > In fact, I would assert its harmful, because it implies that the build > environment needs to have python installed, as well as the pyelftools library, > which we don't need if we build from C. Right