From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/net: document missing speed capabilities feature Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 11:33:17 +0200 Message-ID: <1664240.MkSOEDHSV8@xps> References: <20170510131053.75843-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <17406199.hqjMraK9H2@xps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Shepard Siegel , Ed Czeck , John Miller , John McNamara , Harish Patil , Rasesh Mody , Rahul Lakkireddy , Hemant Agrawal , Shreyansh Jain , Wenzhuo Lu , Marcin Wojtas , Michal Krawczyk , Guy Tzalik , Evgeny Schemeilin , Jing Chen , Helin Zhang , Jingjing Wu , Konstantin Ananyev , Adrien Mazarguil , Nelio Laranjeiro , Matej Vido , Pascal Mazon Return-path: Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E2B3B5 for ; Mon, 15 May 2017 11:33:19 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 15/05/2017 10:40, Ferruh Yigit: > On 5/12/2017 4:48 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 12/05/2017 12:49, Ferruh Yigit: > >> On 5/10/2017 2:51 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > >>> 10/05/2017 15:10, Ferruh Yigit: > >>>> --- a/doc/guides/nics/features/bnx2x.ini > >>>> +++ b/doc/guides/nics/features/bnx2x.ini > >>>> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ > >>>> ; Refer to default.ini for the full list of available PMD features. > >>>> ; > >>>> [Features] > >>>> +Speed capabilities = Y > >>> > >>> We should validate this feature only if the driver advertise the > >>> right speeds for the device. > >> > >> Hi Thomas, > >> > >> Can you please clarify more, what is expected implementation in PMD? > > > > It is expected to advertise only the speeds that the device is > > capable to offer. > > > >> And perhaps a good and a bad sample can be helpful. > > > > Good example: > > drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c > > if (I40E_PHY_TYPE_SUPPORT_40G(hw->phy.phy_types)) > > /* For XL710 */ > > dev_info->speed_capa = ETH_LINK_SPEED_40G; > > else if (I40E_PHY_TYPE_SUPPORT_25G(hw->phy.phy_types)) > > /* For XXV710 */ > > dev_info->speed_capa = ETH_LINK_SPEED_25G; > > else > > /* For X710 */ > > dev_info->speed_capa = ETH_LINK_SPEED_1G | ETH_LINK_SPEED_10G; > > > > Bad example: > > drivers/net/bnx2x/bnx2x_ethdev.c > > dev_info->speed_capa = ETH_LINK_SPEED_10G | ETH_LINK_SPEED_20G; > > Looking at qlogic.com, only some 57840 adapters are capable of 20G. > > OK, I will update the patch according. > > Does it make sense to mark PMDs that report speed_capabilities, but > without checking actual hw, as partial "P", to differentiate them from > the ones that doesn't report at all, also this may help to PMD > maintainers about what to fix. Yes, we can use partial "P" here.