From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] test/bpf: move to examples folder Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 11:35:17 +0100 Message-ID: <1666755.Zq7PloHFGL@xps> References: <20190125202642.66559-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258012413B796@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> <20190220093957.GA87164@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Bruce Richardson , "Ananyev, Konstantin" Return-path: Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0974B271 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 11:35:21 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20190220093957.GA87164@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 20/02/2019 10:39, Bruce Richardson: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 09:35:02AM +0000, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote: > > From: Richardson, Bruce > > > > > > The bpf folder didn't actual contain a test application, but instead > > > basic examples of BPF code for use with testpmd. > > > > Might be the better to create app/test-pmf/bpf directory > > and move them into it. > > Konstantin > > > Assume "test-pmd" in the path, right? I actually think they are better in > examples, myself, but no strong opinions. Anyone else have thoughts? > [Thomas, you are generally a good man for having your say - any input > here?] Those BPF programs can be used by any app having BPF loading support, right? So I think the examples/ directory is the right place.