From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] ethdev: add siblings iterators Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 10:09:55 +0200 Message-ID: <1668070.OiOMRC6GPs@xps> References: <20181130002716.27325-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <4063619.5t9VujUhGY@xps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: Ferruh Yigit , dev , Andrew Rybchenko To: David Marchand Return-path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E3DD2B99 for ; Mon, 1 Apr 2019 10:09:59 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 01/04/2019 08:46, David Marchand: > On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 4:16 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > 19/03/2019 19:04, Ferruh Yigit: > > > On 3/19/2019 5:34 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > >>> +uint16_t __rte_experimental > > > >> > > > >> Do we need _rte_experimental on function definitions? I guess only in > > .h file, > > > >> function declaration is enough. > > > > > > > > Yes we need them both in .h and .c files. > > > > > > Why we need them in .c file? > > > I think the compiler is interested in ones in .h file, because of the > > > experimental checks. > > > > We need the tag in .c file because a check is done in the ELF object > > by buildtools/check-experimental-syms.sh > > > > ? > The attribute should be inherited from the declaration in the header. > If you have a case where it does not work, I'd like to look at it. I don't know such case, it was just a belief. If we can confirm it works well with tag in headers only, I suggest we remove all of them at once. For this patch, I prefer being on the safe side for now.