From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/14] eal: Remove most causes of panic on init Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:06:01 +0200 Message-ID: <16753267.SotxTgSKUM@xps13> References: <20170322201940.24028-1-aconole@redhat.com> <20170323140431.GB8688@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: Bruce Richardson , dev@dpdk.org, Stephen Hemminger To: Aaron Conole Return-path: Received: from mail-wr0-f174.google.com (mail-wr0-f174.google.com [209.85.128.174]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F1C5FAFB for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:06:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wr0-f174.google.com with SMTP id w43so46251487wrb.0 for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 07:06:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170323140431.GB8688@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2017-03-23 14:04, Bruce Richardson: > On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 04:19:26PM -0400, Aaron Conole wrote: > > In many cases, it's enough to simply let the application know that the > > call to initialize DPDK has failed. A complete halt can then be > > decided by the application based on error returned (and the app could > > even attempt a possible re-attempt after some corrective action by the > > user or application). > > > Ran a sanity test compiling with clang on FreeBSD 11 and had a quick > scan of the patches. All looks reasonably ok to me. Did not test on > linux. > > Acked-by: Bruce Richardson Applied, thank you so much for this work. Do you plan to continue hunting rte_panic in DPDK?