From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: doc: announce renaming of ethdev library Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 11:52:39 +0200 Message-ID: <1691991.UWGQpqvx1e@xps13> References: <1469550141-24038-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> <20160727183308.2c2efcf7@pcviktorin.fit.vutbr.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: Jan Viktorin , dev@dpdk.org To: Christian Ehrhardt Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com (mail-wm0-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AC813237 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 11:52:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f43.google.com with SMTP id i5so99500922wmg.0 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 02:52:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-07-28 11:29, Christian Ehrhardt: > Just curious, do we already know by looking ahead if ethdev will get an ABI > bump anyway? > So will the transition be: > a) libethdev4 -> librte_ethdev5 > b)libethdev4 -> librte_ethdev4 > If it is b) would/should one provide a compat symlink then in your Opinion? Good point. We'll make a symlink if the version stay the same. Maybe it will be bumped because of a rework of the hotplug API.