From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] increase port_id range Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 18:02:50 +0200 Message-ID: <1695817.2qOcCKBBMU@xps> References: <20170925032231.72897-1-zhiyong.yang@intel.com> <20170929071727.21618-1-zhiyong.yang@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Zhiyong Yang , Gaetan Rivet , Declan Doherty To: Ferruh Yigit , Nelio Laranjeiro Return-path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66BDB1B211 for ; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 18:02:52 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 06/10/2017 04:15, Ferruh Yigit: > On 9/29/2017 8:17 AM, Zhiyong Yang wrote: > > Zhiyong Yang (5): > > net/bonding: remove bonding APIs using ABI versioning > > ethdev: increase port_id range > > examples: increase port_id range > > test: increase port_id range > > librte_mbuf: modify port initialization value > > Series applied to dpdk-next-net/master, thanks. > > There was merge conflict for: > rte_eth_bond_pmd.c > failsafe_private.h > mlx5_rxtx.h > > Maintainers of these files cc'ed, can you please double check latest > files in next-net? I have re-done the merge of this series in master because it was wrong for mlx5, as notified by Nelio.