* [PATCH] headers: typeof -> __typeof__ to unbreak C++11 code @ 2015-02-25 13:28 Simon Kagstrom 2015-02-26 11:14 ` Thomas Monjalon ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Simon Kagstrom @ 2015-02-25 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dev-VfR2kkLFssw When compiling C++11-code or above (--std=c++11), the build fails with lots of rte_eth_ctrl.h:517:3: note: in expansion of macro RTE_ALIGN (RTE_ALIGN(RTE_ETH_FLOW_MAX, UINT32_BIT)/UINT32_BIT) ^ When reading the GCC info pages, I get the feeling that __typeof__ is a better choice, and that indeed works when including the headers in C++ files (--std=c++11). There are some typeof()s left in C files, the patch only touches the public API. Signed-off-by: Simon Kagstrom <simon.kagstrom-vI6UBbBVNY+JA8cjQkG2/g@public.gmane.org> --- lib/librte_acl/acl_vect.h | 8 ++++---- lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h | 17 +++++++++-------- lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/librte_acl/acl_vect.h b/lib/librte_acl/acl_vect.h index 6cc1999..de47071 100644 --- a/lib/librte_acl/acl_vect.h +++ b/lib/librte_acl/acl_vect.h @@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ extern "C" { * hi - contains high 32 bits of given N transitions. */ #define ACL_TR_HILO(P, TC, tr0, tr1, lo, hi) do { \ - lo = (typeof(lo))_##P##_shuffle_ps((TC)(tr0), (TC)(tr1), 0x88); \ - hi = (typeof(hi))_##P##_shuffle_ps((TC)(tr0), (TC)(tr1), 0xdd); \ + lo = (__typeof__(lo))_##P##_shuffle_ps((TC)(tr0), (TC)(tr1), 0x88); \ + hi = (__typeof__(hi))_##P##_shuffle_ps((TC)(tr0), (TC)(tr1), 0xdd); \ } while (0) @@ -74,8 +74,8 @@ extern "C" { addr, index_mask, next_input, shuffle_input, \ ones_16, range_base, tr_lo, tr_hi) do { \ \ - typeof(addr) in, node_type, r, t; \ - typeof(addr) dfa_msk, dfa_ofs, quad_ofs; \ + __typeof__(addr) in, node_type, r, t; \ + __typeof__(addr) dfa_msk, dfa_ofs, quad_ofs; \ \ t = _##P##_xor_si##S(index_mask, index_mask); \ in = _##P##_shuffle_epi8(next_input, shuffle_input); \ diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h index 8ac940c..40c2603 100644 --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ #ifdef __cplusplus extern "C" { + #endif #include <stdint.h> @@ -112,7 +113,7 @@ rte_align_floor_int(uintptr_t ptr, uintptr_t align) * must be a power-of-two value. */ #define RTE_PTR_ALIGN_FLOOR(ptr, align) \ - (typeof(ptr))rte_align_floor_int((uintptr_t)ptr, align) + (__typeof__(ptr))rte_align_floor_int((uintptr_t)ptr, align) /** * Macro to align a value to a given power-of-two. The resultant value @@ -121,7 +122,7 @@ rte_align_floor_int(uintptr_t ptr, uintptr_t align) * power-of-two value. */ #define RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR(val, align) \ - (typeof(val))((val) & (~((typeof(val))((align) - 1)))) + (__typeof__(val))((val) & (~((__typeof__(val))((align) - 1)))) /** * Macro to align a pointer to a given power-of-two. The resultant @@ -130,7 +131,7 @@ rte_align_floor_int(uintptr_t ptr, uintptr_t align) * must be a power-of-two value. */ #define RTE_PTR_ALIGN_CEIL(ptr, align) \ - RTE_PTR_ALIGN_FLOOR((typeof(ptr))RTE_PTR_ADD(ptr, (align) - 1), align) + RTE_PTR_ALIGN_FLOOR((__typeof__(ptr))RTE_PTR_ADD(ptr, (align) - 1), align) /** * Macro to align a value to a given power-of-two. The resultant value @@ -139,7 +140,7 @@ rte_align_floor_int(uintptr_t ptr, uintptr_t align) * value. */ #define RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(val, align) \ - RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR(((val) + ((typeof(val)) (align) - 1)), align) + RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR(((val) + ((__typeof__(val)) (align) - 1)), align) /** * Macro to align a pointer to a given power-of-two. The resultant @@ -257,8 +258,8 @@ rte_align64pow2(uint64_t v) * Macro to return the minimum of two numbers */ #define RTE_MIN(a, b) ({ \ - typeof (a) _a = (a); \ - typeof (b) _b = (b); \ + __typeof__ (a) _a = (a); \ + __typeof__ (b) _b = (b); \ _a < _b ? _a : _b; \ }) @@ -266,8 +267,8 @@ rte_align64pow2(uint64_t v) * Macro to return the maximum of two numbers */ #define RTE_MAX(a, b) ({ \ - typeof (a) _a = (a); \ - typeof (b) _b = (b); \ + __typeof__ (a) _a = (a); \ + __typeof__ (b) _b = (b); \ _a > _b ? _a : _b; \ }) diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci.h b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci.h index 3df07e8..bc065d4 100644 --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci.h +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci.h @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ do { \ val = strtoul((in), &end, 16); \ if (errno != 0 || end[0] != (dlm) || val > (lim)) \ return (-EINVAL); \ - (fd) = (typeof (fd))val; \ + (fd) = (__typeof__ (fd))val; \ (in) = end + 1; \ } while(0) -- 1.9.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] headers: typeof -> __typeof__ to unbreak C++11 code 2015-02-25 13:28 [PATCH] headers: typeof -> __typeof__ to unbreak C++11 code Simon Kagstrom @ 2015-02-26 11:14 ` Thomas Monjalon 2015-02-26 11:24 ` Simon Kågström 2015-02-26 16:02 ` Mcnamara, John 2015-02-27 16:24 ` Ananyev, Konstantin 2015-03-06 15:59 ` [PATCHv2] " Konstantin Ananyev 2 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2015-02-26 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dev-VfR2kkLFssw, Simon Kagstrom Hi Simon, 2015-02-25 14:28, Simon Kagstrom: > When compiling C++11-code or above (--std=c++11), the build fails with > lots of > > rte_eth_ctrl.h:517:3: note: in expansion of macro RTE_ALIGN > (RTE_ALIGN(RTE_ETH_FLOW_MAX, UINT32_BIT)/UINT32_BIT) > ^ > > When reading the GCC info pages, I get the feeling that __typeof__ is > a better choice, and that indeed works when including the headers in > C++ files (--std=c++11). I'd like to be sure that it's working with every compilers we support (gcc, icc, clang). Anyone to check please? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] headers: typeof -> __typeof__ to unbreak C++11 code 2015-02-26 11:14 ` Thomas Monjalon @ 2015-02-26 11:24 ` Simon Kågström 2015-02-26 16:02 ` Mcnamara, John 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Simon Kågström @ 2015-02-26 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Monjalon, dev-VfR2kkLFssw On 2015-02-26 12:14, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-02-25 14:28, Simon Kagstrom: >> When compiling C++11-code or above (--std=c++11), the build fails with >> lots of >> >> rte_eth_ctrl.h:517:3: note: in expansion of macro RTE_ALIGN >> (RTE_ALIGN(RTE_ETH_FLOW_MAX, UINT32_BIT)/UINT32_BIT) >> ^ > I'd like to be sure that it's working with every compilers we support > (gcc, icc, clang). > Anyone to check please? I guess you mean compiling DPDK itself, but I can add that compiling my example "app" (i.e., a file which includes the DPDK headers and an empty main()) with clang++ gives more problems: include/rte_devargs.h:89:5: error: 'virtual' can only appear on non-static member functions } virtual; ^ and a slew of warnings of the type include/rte_byteorder_64.h:45:2: warning: 'register' storage class specifier is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-register] register uint64_t x = _x; ^~~~~~~~~ include/rte_memcpy.h:85:25: warning: cast from 'const uint8_t *' (aka 'const unsigned char *') to 'const __m128i *' increases required alignment from 1 to 16 [-Wcast-align] xmm0 = _mm_loadu_si128((const __m128i *)src); // Simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] headers: typeof -> __typeof__ to unbreak C++11 code 2015-02-26 11:14 ` Thomas Monjalon 2015-02-26 11:24 ` Simon Kågström @ 2015-02-26 16:02 ` Mcnamara, John 1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Mcnamara, John @ 2015-02-26 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Monjalon, dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org, Simon Kagstrom > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 11:15 AM > To: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org; Simon Kagstrom > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] headers: typeof -> __typeof__ to unbreak > C++11 code > I'd like to be sure that it's working with every compilers we support > (gcc, icc, clang). > Anyone to check please? Hi, The patch works with: gcc (GCC) 4.7.2 20121109 (Red Hat 4.7.2-8) icc (ICC) 13.1.1 20130313 clang version 3.3 (tags/RELEASE_33/rc2) Regards, John ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] headers: typeof -> __typeof__ to unbreak C++11 code 2015-02-25 13:28 [PATCH] headers: typeof -> __typeof__ to unbreak C++11 code Simon Kagstrom 2015-02-26 11:14 ` Thomas Monjalon @ 2015-02-27 16:24 ` Ananyev, Konstantin [not found] ` <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258213F3012-pww93C2UFcwu0RiL9chJVbfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> 2015-03-06 15:59 ` [PATCHv2] " Konstantin Ananyev 2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Ananyev, Konstantin @ 2015-02-27 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Simon Kagstrom, dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Simon Kagstrom > Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 1:29 PM > To: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] headers: typeof -> __typeof__ to unbreak C++11 code > > When compiling C++11-code or above (--std=c++11), the build fails with > lots of > > rte_eth_ctrl.h:517:3: note: in expansion of macro RTE_ALIGN > (RTE_ALIGN(RTE_ETH_FLOW_MAX, UINT32_BIT)/UINT32_BIT) > ^ > > When reading the GCC info pages, I get the feeling that __typeof__ is > a better choice, and that indeed works when including the headers in > C++ files (--std=c++11). > > There are some typeof()s left in C files, the patch only touches the > public API. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Kagstrom <simon.kagstrom-vI6UBbBVNY+JA8cjQkG2/g@public.gmane.org> > --- > lib/librte_acl/acl_vect.h | 8 ++++---- > lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h | 17 +++++++++-------- > lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci.h | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/librte_acl/acl_vect.h b/lib/librte_acl/acl_vect.h > index 6cc1999..de47071 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_acl/acl_vect.h > +++ b/lib/librte_acl/acl_vect.h > @@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ extern "C" { > * hi - contains high 32 bits of given N transitions. > */ > #define ACL_TR_HILO(P, TC, tr0, tr1, lo, hi) do { \ > - lo = (typeof(lo))_##P##_shuffle_ps((TC)(tr0), (TC)(tr1), 0x88); \ > - hi = (typeof(hi))_##P##_shuffle_ps((TC)(tr0), (TC)(tr1), 0xdd); \ > + lo = (__typeof__(lo))_##P##_shuffle_ps((TC)(tr0), (TC)(tr1), 0x88); \ > + hi = (__typeof__(hi))_##P##_shuffle_ps((TC)(tr0), (TC)(tr1), 0xdd); \ > } while (0) > > > @@ -74,8 +74,8 @@ extern "C" { > addr, index_mask, next_input, shuffle_input, \ > ones_16, range_base, tr_lo, tr_hi) do { \ > \ > - typeof(addr) in, node_type, r, t; \ > - typeof(addr) dfa_msk, dfa_ofs, quad_ofs; \ > + __typeof__(addr) in, node_type, r, t; \ > + __typeof__(addr) dfa_msk, dfa_ofs, quad_ofs; \ > \ > t = _##P##_xor_si##S(index_mask, index_mask); \ > in = _##P##_shuffle_epi8(next_input, shuffle_input); \ > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h > index 8ac940c..40c2603 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h > @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ > > #ifdef __cplusplus > extern "C" { > + > #endif > > #include <stdint.h> > @@ -112,7 +113,7 @@ rte_align_floor_int(uintptr_t ptr, uintptr_t align) > * must be a power-of-two value. > */ > #define RTE_PTR_ALIGN_FLOOR(ptr, align) \ > - (typeof(ptr))rte_align_floor_int((uintptr_t)ptr, align) > + (__typeof__(ptr))rte_align_floor_int((uintptr_t)ptr, align) > > /** > * Macro to align a value to a given power-of-two. The resultant value > @@ -121,7 +122,7 @@ rte_align_floor_int(uintptr_t ptr, uintptr_t align) > * power-of-two value. > */ > #define RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR(val, align) \ > - (typeof(val))((val) & (~((typeof(val))((align) - 1)))) > + (__typeof__(val))((val) & (~((__typeof__(val))((align) - 1)))) > > /** > * Macro to align a pointer to a given power-of-two. The resultant > @@ -130,7 +131,7 @@ rte_align_floor_int(uintptr_t ptr, uintptr_t align) > * must be a power-of-two value. > */ > #define RTE_PTR_ALIGN_CEIL(ptr, align) \ > - RTE_PTR_ALIGN_FLOOR((typeof(ptr))RTE_PTR_ADD(ptr, (align) - 1), align) > + RTE_PTR_ALIGN_FLOOR((__typeof__(ptr))RTE_PTR_ADD(ptr, (align) - 1), align) > > /** > * Macro to align a value to a given power-of-two. The resultant value > @@ -139,7 +140,7 @@ rte_align_floor_int(uintptr_t ptr, uintptr_t align) > * value. > */ > #define RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(val, align) \ > - RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR(((val) + ((typeof(val)) (align) - 1)), align) > + RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR(((val) + ((__typeof__(val)) (align) - 1)), align) > > /** > * Macro to align a pointer to a given power-of-two. The resultant > @@ -257,8 +258,8 @@ rte_align64pow2(uint64_t v) > * Macro to return the minimum of two numbers > */ > #define RTE_MIN(a, b) ({ \ > - typeof (a) _a = (a); \ > - typeof (b) _b = (b); \ > + __typeof__ (a) _a = (a); \ > + __typeof__ (b) _b = (b); \ > _a < _b ? _a : _b; \ > }) > > @@ -266,8 +267,8 @@ rte_align64pow2(uint64_t v) > * Macro to return the maximum of two numbers > */ > #define RTE_MAX(a, b) ({ \ > - typeof (a) _a = (a); \ > - typeof (b) _b = (b); \ > + __typeof__ (a) _a = (a); \ > + __typeof__ (b) _b = (b); \ > _a > _b ? _a : _b; \ > }) > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci.h b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci.h > index 3df07e8..bc065d4 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci.h > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci.h > @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ do { \ > val = strtoul((in), &end, 16); \ > if (errno != 0 || end[0] != (dlm) || val > (lim)) \ > return (-EINVAL); \ > - (fd) = (typeof (fd))val; \ > + (fd) = (__typeof__ (fd))val; \ > (in) = end + 1; \ > } while(0) > > -- Actually, I wonder wouldn't something like the one below be sufficient? Konstantin diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h b/lib/librte_eal/common/ index 8ac940c..1867692 100644 --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h @@ -51,6 +51,15 @@ extern "C" { #include <errno.h> #include <limits.h> +#ifndef typeof +#define typeof __typeof__ +#endif + +#ifndef asm +#define asm __asm__ +#endif + + /*********** Macros to eliminate unused variable warnings ********/ /** ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258213F3012-pww93C2UFcwu0RiL9chJVbfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH] headers: typeof -> __typeof__ to unbreak C++11 code [not found] ` <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258213F3012-pww93C2UFcwu0RiL9chJVbfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> @ 2015-03-02 7:55 ` Simon Kågström [not found] ` <54F41765.1050403-vI6UBbBVNY+JA8cjQkG2/g@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Simon Kågström @ 2015-03-02 7:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ananyev, Konstantin, dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org On 2015-02-27 17:24, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote: > Actually, I wonder wouldn't something like the one below be sufficient? > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h b/lib/librte_eal/common/ > index 8ac940c..1867692 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h > @@ -51,6 +51,15 @@ extern "C" { > #include <errno.h> > #include <limits.h> > > +#ifndef typeof > +#define typeof __typeof__ > +#endif > + > +#ifndef asm > +#define asm __asm__ > +#endif Yes, I've tested, and this works with g++ as well. // Simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <54F41765.1050403-vI6UBbBVNY+JA8cjQkG2/g@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH] headers: typeof -> __typeof__ to unbreak C++11 code [not found] ` <54F41765.1050403-vI6UBbBVNY+JA8cjQkG2/g@public.gmane.org> @ 2015-03-06 8:28 ` Simon Kågström [not found] ` <54F9651B.7060603-vI6UBbBVNY+JA8cjQkG2/g@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Simon Kågström @ 2015-03-06 8:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dev-VfR2kkLFssw Ping? Konstantins simpler patch is fine for me, but at least one of these two would be very nice to have so that modern C++ code can use DPDK. // Simon On 2015-03-02 08:55, Simon Kågström wrote: > On 2015-02-27 17:24, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote: >> Actually, I wonder wouldn't something like the one below be sufficient? >> >> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h b/lib/librte_eal/common/ >> index 8ac940c..1867692 100644 >> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h >> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h >> @@ -51,6 +51,15 @@ extern "C" { >> #include <errno.h> >> #include <limits.h> >> >> +#ifndef typeof >> +#define typeof __typeof__ >> +#endif >> + >> +#ifndef asm >> +#define asm __asm__ >> +#endif > > Yes, I've tested, and this works with g++ as well. > > // Simon > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <54F9651B.7060603-vI6UBbBVNY+JA8cjQkG2/g@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH] headers: typeof -> __typeof__ to unbreak C++11 code [not found] ` <54F9651B.7060603-vI6UBbBVNY+JA8cjQkG2/g@public.gmane.org> @ 2015-03-06 10:30 ` Ananyev, Konstantin [not found] ` <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258213F44D4-pww93C2UFcwu0RiL9chJVbfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Ananyev, Konstantin @ 2015-03-06 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Simon Kågström, dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Hi Simon, > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Simon Kågström > Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 8:28 AM > To: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] headers: typeof -> __typeof__ to unbreak C++11 code > > Ping? Konstantins simpler patch is fine for me, but at least one of > these two would be very nice to have so that modern C++ code can use DPDK. > > // Simon Can you do v2 as suggested, or do you want me to do it? Thanks Konstantin > > On 2015-03-02 08:55, Simon Kågström wrote: > > On 2015-02-27 17:24, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote: > >> Actually, I wonder wouldn't something like the one below be sufficient? > >> > >> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h b/lib/librte_eal/common/ > >> index 8ac940c..1867692 100644 > >> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h > >> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h > >> @@ -51,6 +51,15 @@ extern "C" { > >> #include <errno.h> > >> #include <limits.h> > >> > >> +#ifndef typeof > >> +#define typeof __typeof__ > >> +#endif > >> + > >> +#ifndef asm > >> +#define asm __asm__ > >> +#endif > > > > Yes, I've tested, and this works with g++ as well. > > > > // Simon > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258213F44D4-pww93C2UFcwu0RiL9chJVbfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCH] headers: typeof -> __typeof__ to unbreak C++11 code [not found] ` <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258213F44D4-pww93C2UFcwu0RiL9chJVbfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> @ 2015-03-06 13:42 ` Simon Kågström 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Simon Kågström @ 2015-03-06 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ananyev, Konstantin, dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org On 2015-03-06 11:30, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote: > > Hi Simon, > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Simon Kågström >> Sent: Friday, March 06, 2015 8:28 AM >> To: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] headers: typeof -> __typeof__ to unbreak C++11 code >> >> Ping? Konstantins simpler patch is fine for me, but at least one of >> these two would be very nice to have so that modern C++ code can use DPDK. >> > Can you do v2 as suggested, or do you want me to do it? You wrote that patch (which looks better than mine), so feel free to submit it! Thanks, // Simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv2] headers: typeof -> __typeof__ to unbreak C++11 code 2015-02-25 13:28 [PATCH] headers: typeof -> __typeof__ to unbreak C++11 code Simon Kagstrom 2015-02-26 11:14 ` Thomas Monjalon 2015-02-27 16:24 ` Ananyev, Konstantin @ 2015-03-06 15:59 ` Konstantin Ananyev [not found] ` <1425657587-23516-1-git-send-email-konstantin.ananyev-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread From: Konstantin Ananyev @ 2015-03-06 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: dev-VfR2kkLFssw v2: Instead of changing all the affected files, define 'typeofi' and 'asm' if needed. When compiling C++11-code or above (--std=c++11), the build fails with lots of rte_eth_ctrl.h:517:3: note: in expansion of macro RTE_ALIGN (RTE_ALIGN(RTE_ETH_FLOW_MAX, UINT32_BIT)/UINT32_BIT) ^ When reading the GCC info pages, I get the feeling that __typeof__ is a better choice, and that indeed works when including the headers in C++ files (--std=c++11). There are some typeof()s left in C files, the patch only touches the public API. Signed-off-by: Simon Kagstrom <simon.kagstrom-vI6UBbBVNY+JA8cjQkG2/g@public.gmane.org> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> --- lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h index 8ac940c..1867692 100644 --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_common.h @@ -51,6 +51,15 @@ extern "C" { #include <errno.h> #include <limits.h> +#ifndef typeof +#define typeof __typeof__ +#endif + +#ifndef asm +#define asm __asm__ +#endif + + /*********** Macros to eliminate unused variable warnings ********/ /** -- 1.8.5.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <1425657587-23516-1-git-send-email-konstantin.ananyev-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>]
* Re: [PATCHv2] headers: typeof -> __typeof__ to unbreak C++11 code [not found] ` <1425657587-23516-1-git-send-email-konstantin.ananyev-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> @ 2015-03-09 16:38 ` Thomas Monjalon 0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2015-03-09 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Konstantin Ananyev; +Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw 2015-03-06 15:59, Konstantin Ananyev: > v2: > Instead of changing all the affected files, > define 'typeofi' and 'asm' if needed. > > When compiling C++11-code or above (--std=c++11), the build fails with > lots of > > rte_eth_ctrl.h:517:3: note: in expansion of macro RTE_ALIGN > (RTE_ALIGN(RTE_ETH_FLOW_MAX, UINT32_BIT)/UINT32_BIT) > ^ > > When reading the GCC info pages, I get the feeling that __typeof__ is > a better choice, and that indeed works when including the headers in > C++ files (--std=c++11). > > There are some typeof()s left in C files, the patch only touches the > public API. > > Signed-off-by: Simon Kagstrom <simon.kagstrom-vI6UBbBVNY+JA8cjQkG2/g@public.gmane.org> > Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Applied, thanks ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-03-09 16:38 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-02-25 13:28 [PATCH] headers: typeof -> __typeof__ to unbreak C++11 code Simon Kagstrom 2015-02-26 11:14 ` Thomas Monjalon 2015-02-26 11:24 ` Simon Kågström 2015-02-26 16:02 ` Mcnamara, John 2015-02-27 16:24 ` Ananyev, Konstantin [not found] ` <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258213F3012-pww93C2UFcwu0RiL9chJVbfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> 2015-03-02 7:55 ` Simon Kågström [not found] ` <54F41765.1050403-vI6UBbBVNY+JA8cjQkG2/g@public.gmane.org> 2015-03-06 8:28 ` Simon Kågström [not found] ` <54F9651B.7060603-vI6UBbBVNY+JA8cjQkG2/g@public.gmane.org> 2015-03-06 10:30 ` Ananyev, Konstantin [not found] ` <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258213F44D4-pww93C2UFcwu0RiL9chJVbfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> 2015-03-06 13:42 ` Simon Kågström 2015-03-06 15:59 ` [PATCHv2] " Konstantin Ananyev [not found] ` <1425657587-23516-1-git-send-email-konstantin.ananyev-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> 2015-03-09 16:38 ` Thomas Monjalon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).