From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] net/szedata2: add support for new NIC
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2018 17:29:50 +0100
Message-ID: <169d539d-a30c-dd80-394c-7740aac9c0de@intel.com>
References: <1523023929-1257-1-git-send-email-vido@cesnet.cz>
 <1523518890-7075-3-git-send-email-vido@cesnet.cz>
 <6df92274-3b39-4750-0823-a234cffad048@intel.com>
 <CAAnEdtB=jNrTONosV+p0HHfNh0k0Fm07_LgmVvfExNQb5VApGA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1641ecc9-0d2a-d188-90ca-abf1991f821f@intel.com>
 <CAAnEdtAf7qBYDB9hwNHzvYVWojLS3rVrFWx61W5w2E0rsij_2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: Matej Vido <vido@cesnet.cz>, dev@dpdk.org, fpga-sw <fpga-sw@netcope.com>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Jan_Reme=c5=a1?= <remes@netcope.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 075B81C69A
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 13 Apr 2018 18:29:54 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <CAAnEdtAf7qBYDB9hwNHzvYVWojLS3rVrFWx61W5w2E0rsij_2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Language: en-US
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On 4/13/2018 4:03 PM, Jan Remeš wrote:
> It is mentioned on the website with the packages itself. The current
> version works with the reworked PMD - there is a headline which says:
> "DPDK from 18.05" (since we expect the patches to land in the upcoming
> release; we will update it if this does not happen).
> 
> The older version is still available on the website, with appropriate
> installation steps and a headline that says "DPDK up to 18.02".
> 
> Is this form of documentation sufficient for you or would you like to
> see it mentioned in the DPDK documentation as well?

I think it is better to have some level of information in DPDK documentation too.

There is already a release note update in this set, do you think does it make
sense to mention new dependency there?

I will get patches right now, please send doc/release notes updates as
incremental patches.

> 
> Thanks,
>   Jan
> Jan Remeš | Software Developer
> Netcope Technologies, a.s.
> 
> T: +420 530 510 680
> A: Sochorova 3232/34, Brno, 616 00, Czech Republic
> W: www.netcope.com
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 4:26 PM, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> wrote:
>> On 4/13/2018 9:17 AM, Jan Remeš wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Matej,
>>>>
>>>> Where szedata_get_area_numa_node() is defined?
>>>> Is it possible that you are missing a patch?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> ferruh
>>>
>>> Hi Ferruh,
>>>
>>> the new PMD requires an updated version of libsze2 and drivers. We
>>> have just published the updated packages here:
>>> https://www.netcope.com/en/company/community-support/dpdk-libsze2.
>>
>> DPDK documentation mentions about libsze2 dependency but there is no version
>> mentioned.
>>
>> And I have not seen any note that says a new version of library is required,
>> perhaps I missed it, is there a documentation which says which version of DPDK
>> requires which version of the dependencies?
>>
>> What is the way of tracing this dependency?
>>
>>> Sorry for the hickup.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>   Jan
>>>
>>