From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] qat: change optimization flag for Intel QuickAssist Technology Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2016 16:56:52 +0200 Message-ID: <1716498.tfoInuLrnx@xps13> References: <1462872255-13100-1-git-send-email-arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" , dev@dpdk.org, "Trahe, Fiona" , "Griffin, John" To: "Jain, Deepak K" , "Kusztal, ArkadiuszX" Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com (mail-wm0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3618B6CBC for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2016 16:56:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f52.google.com with SMTP id n184so141276103wmn.1 for ; Tue, 07 Jun 2016 07:56:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-05-31 11:29, De Lara Guarch, Pablo: > Hi Deepak/Arek, > > > Hi Thomas, > > > > This change was made to fix the compilation issues arising when optimization > > flag was changed. Hence its related to same optimization flag patch. > > Do you want us to separate the Makefile and .c file change? > > I think you need to explain the change in the .c file and separate it to another patch, if it is not related to the Makefile change (and if it is related, consider creating a patchset, maybe). Yes, or at least, explain the change in the commit message. Thanks