From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] nfp-uio: new uio driver for netronome nfp6000 card Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:03:08 +0200 Message-ID: <1729488.TmXe30SXlp@xps13> References: <1444992324-5504-1-git-send-email-alejandro.lucero@netronome.com> <2304404.uKjJZErY2S@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Alejandro Lucero Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com [209.85.212.175]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E69DC416 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 18:04:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wijp11 with SMTP id p11so102310611wij.0 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 09:04:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2015-10-21 16:57, Alejandro Lucero: > I understand interest for not having another UIO driver does exist. We > could maintain an external nfp_uio by now till either we get rid of it or > we definitely find out it is really needed. any chance to accept nfp_uio by > now? No, there are some work currently to get rid of igb_uio. So there are little chances to accept nfp_uio one day. Please take the first step of integrating your PMD without link interrupt. Later we'll be able to discuss how to mitigate the interrupt issue.