From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] ethdev: clarify the origin of mbufs Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:57:37 +0200 Message-ID: <1735678.KU5sPVVQs6@xps13> References: <1465825528-28846-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Xiaoban_Wu@student.uml.edu To: Olivier Matz Return-path: Received: from mail-lf0-f47.google.com (mail-lf0-f47.google.com [209.85.215.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F564CB22 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 16:57:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lf0-f47.google.com with SMTP id f6so15963504lfg.0 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 07:57:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1465825528-28846-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-06-13 15:45, Olivier Matz: > Following the discussion on dpdk-users [1], enhance the API > documentation of rte_eth_tx_burst() to specify that the mbufs have to be > allocated from a pool. > > [1] http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/2016-June/000618.html > > Reported-by: Wu Xiaoban > Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz Applied, thanks