From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: fast red autotest Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 13:41:03 +0200 Message-ID: <17438858.1XjK0Grm1a@xps13> References: <2017180.gcuZq2Skul@xps13> <3EB4FA525960D640B5BDFFD6A3D89126479EC622@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: "Dumitrescu, Cristian" , dev@dpdk.org To: "Kantecki, Tomasz" Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com (mail-wm0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C6CC47D1 for ; Wed, 25 May 2016 13:41:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f52.google.com with SMTP id n129so59141948wmn.1 for ; Wed, 25 May 2016 04:41:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-05-25 11:06, Kantecki, Tomasz: > I had a quick look through these tests and it will need some effort to rework them to run in shorter time. > I agree to remove this suite from the fast_test as long as it gets exercised in other test paths. Is it possible to split them in - short functional tests - long run / perf tests ? So we could keep some basic tests in fast_test. I expect that tests which are not part of fast_test won't be run often or in enough various environments.