From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix build without ixgbe
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:09:04 +0200
Message-ID: <1764991.rUGqORsVcK@xps>
References: <20170615095446.2187-1-thomas@monjalon.net>
 <ff6185d5-5d11-3c1b-4138-7b040ae35394@intel.com>
 <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC09093B5CF493@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: "Lu, Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>, "Nicolau,
 Radu" <radu.nicolau@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E1262BD1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:09:06 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <6A0DE07E22DDAD4C9103DF62FEBC09093B5CF493@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

16/06/2017 03:29, Lu, Wenzhuo:
> From: Nicolau, Radu
> > 
> > Looks ok to me, but why would one enable IXGBE_BYPASS without enabling
> > IXGBE?
> 
> Although the scenario doesn't make sense, I think it's better to add more check to avoid the users making any mistake.

Applied