From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Convert lpm data from header to resource Date: Fri, 06 May 2016 15:20:21 +0200 Message-ID: <1769789.4YeEevWBHP@xps13> References: <1462539092-24389-1-git-send-email-bruce.richardson@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Bruce Richardson Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com (mail-wm0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49D973239 for ; Fri, 6 May 2016 15:20:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f45.google.com with SMTP id e201so57635017wme.0 for ; Fri, 06 May 2016 06:20:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1462539092-24389-1-git-send-email-bruce.richardson@intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-05-06 13:51, Bruce Richardson: > It takes the existing lpm large routing table information and converts it > from a header file included at compile time to a resource linked in. This > improves things in two ways: > 1. Improves DPDK build time > 2. Removes approx 1 million lines of code from our LOC counts, as the header > file no longer counts as code, but more correctly as data. Good improvement! Is it possible to go further and 3. Reduce size of the DPDK tarball by removing some test data? What is the benefit of having 21 MB and 7 MB of routes data?