From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kni: remove single mempool, single mem_chunk restriction Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 19:20:06 +0200 Message-ID: <1780631.bJrZJTOcPN@xps13> References: <1472124636-27227-1-git-send-email-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Ferruh Yigit Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com (mail-wm0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE5892BDC for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 19:20:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f45.google.com with SMTP id l132so280624391wmf.0 for ; Wed, 21 Sep 2016 10:20:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1472124636-27227-1-git-send-email-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-08-25 12:30, Ferruh Yigit: > Use mempool buf_addr and buf_physaddr fields for address translation. > > Since each mbuf address calculated separately, the restriction of all > mbufs should come from a continuous memory restriction is no more valid. > > mbuf related FIFO's content changed, rx_q and alloc_q now carries > physical address of mbufs. tx_q and free_q content not changed, they > still carries virtual address of mbufs. > > Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit Applied, thanks The next 2 patches have been squashed with the first one as they are tightly related.