From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon-pdR9zngts4EAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7]i40e:support VxLAN packet
	identification
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 10:33:12 +0200
Message-ID: <1786745.npCCrjnXn5@xps13>
References: <1409038294-21693-1-git-send-email-jijiang.liu@intel.com>
 <1672259.DZkGQ2cZmA@xps13>
 <1ED644BD7E0A5F4091CF203DAFB8E4CC01D631C0@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org
To: "Liu, Jijiang" <jijiang.liu-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Return-path: <dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <1ED644BD7E0A5F4091CF203DAFB8E4CC01D631C0-0J0gbvR4kThpB2pF5aRoyrfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org>

2014-08-28 01:33, Liu, Jijiang:
> > >  lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c     |   63 ++++++++++++
> > >  lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h     |   76 ++++++++++++++
> > >  lib/librte_ether/rte_ether.h      |   10 ++
> > >  lib/librte_pmd_i40e/i40e_ethdev.c |  199
> > 
> > Changing ethdev API is so sensible that it deserves a separated commit.
> > 
> You meant that I should split the patch into two patches, one is for
> changes in librte_ether, other is for Change in librte_pmd_i40e?

Yes, 1 patch for ethdev (including rte_ether.h) and the other one for i40e.

-- 
Thomas