From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Add in_flight_bitmask so as to use full 32 bits of tag. Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 10:18:36 +0100 Message-ID: <1790564.eeil24UKmd@xps13> References: <1415630642-3905-1-git-send-email-jigsaw@gmail.com> <1795062.hHiWS5oXJV@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org To: jigsaw Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" 2014-11-13 08:56, jigsaw: > >>Do you have another commit before this one in your tree? > > Yes this patch relies on this one: > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-November/007943.html > > Sorry I didn't make it clear. The new field usr in rte_mbuf was under same > cover letter in v2 of the in_flight_bitmask patch. > Then in_flight_bitmask has a v3 patch, but I didn't include the rte_mbuf in > the same cover letter, coz the usr patch has been ACKed. OK. In this case, you should re-submit the whole serie and add the acked-by line in the patch, and/or use the --in-reply-to option to place the v3 patch in the original thread. No need to resend it, I can manage to get the whole patchset now. Thanks -- Thomas