From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: fast red autotest Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 16:42:02 +0200 Message-ID: <1802112.k4C4WrGtVZ@xps13> References: <2017180.gcuZq2Skul@xps13> <17438858.1XjK0Grm1a@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: "Dumitrescu, Cristian" , dev@dpdk.org To: "Kantecki, Tomasz" Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com (mail-wm0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD782946 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 16:42:04 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id z87so139782754wmh.0 for ; Fri, 27 May 2016 07:42:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-05-27 14:04, Kantecki, Tomasz: > > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > > Is it possible to split them in > > - short functional tests > > - long run / perf tests > > ? > > So we could keep some basic tests in fast_test. > > I expect that tests which are not part of fast_test won't be run often or in > > enough various environments. > > It sounds like a good idea Thomas. I ran the test couple of times and it seems that functional test #4 takes most of the time and could be removed to long run scenario. Other functional tests run rather promptly. > Next week, I can prepare patch to implement long and short run commands for this test suite. Would it be OK? Yes. The goal is to have "make fast_test" really fast. Thanks