From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/11] Add installation rules for dpdk files. Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 16:38:56 +0100 Message-ID: <1805523.10WMuFvzjH@xps13> References: <1442608390-12537-1-git-send-email-mario.alfredo.c.arevalo@intel.com> <1449178671-32288-1-git-send-email-mario.alfredo.c.arevalo@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, jos.c.venegas.munoz@intel.com To: Mario Carrillo Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com (mail-wm0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E930D8E86 for ; Fri, 4 Dec 2015 16:40:06 +0100 (CET) Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so70165833wme.1 for ; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 07:40:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1449178671-32288-1-git-send-email-mario.alfredo.c.arevalo@intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Mario, 2015-12-03 15:37, Mario Carrillo: > DPDK package lacks of a mechanism to install libraries, headers > applications, kernel modules and sdk files to a file system tree. > This patch set allows to install files based on the next > proposal: > http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/file-hierarchy.html I think we should change the patchwork status of this series because I do not see the benefit compared to my newer series: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-December/029416.html