From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: remove DPDK from guide titles Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:25:40 +0100 Message-ID: <18372563.IoPFRs03Cq@xps13> References: <1450350948-27298-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit To: dev@dpdk.org Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FEC68D3A for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:26:58 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id l126so29380598wml.1 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 08:26:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > > In HTML and PDF guides, it is clear in the header that the doc is related > > to the DPDK. > > So "DPDK" is redundant and can be removed from FAQ and release notes > > titles to improve consistency. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon > > Good point. > > Acked-by: John McNamara Applied