From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/10] mbuf_offload: library to support attaching offloads to a mbuf Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 17:11:39 +0100 Message-ID: <1845766.0xhOtsmPbb@xps13> References: <1447101259-18972-1-git-send-email-declan.doherty@intel.com> <1447176763-19303-1-git-send-email-declan.doherty@intel.com> <1447176763-19303-7-git-send-email-declan.doherty@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Declan Doherty Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f50.google.com (mail-wm0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A79B959B for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 17:12:53 +0100 (CET) Received: by wmec201 with SMTP id c201so37355766wme.1 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 08:12:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1447176763-19303-7-git-send-email-declan.doherty@intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2015-11-10 17:32, Declan Doherty: > +DEPDIRS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_MBUF_OFFLOAD) += lib/librte_cryptodev Why this lib depends on cryptodev? Shoudn't be the reverse?