From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] ethdev: add support for PMD-tuned Tx/Rx parameters Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 17:40:08 +0200 Message-ID: <1867154.rqMg12d5dS@xps> References: <20180321142749.27520-1-remy.horton@intel.com> <20180321142749.27520-2-remy.horton@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, John McNamara , Wenzhuo Lu , Jingjing Wu , Qi Zhang , Beilei Xing , Shreyansh Jain , ferruh.yigit@intel.com To: Remy Horton Return-path: Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E267CFC for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2018 17:40:41 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20180321142749.27520-2-remy.horton@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" I know that this patch is already applied, but I have some comments below. Please try to address them. 21/03/2018 15:27, Remy Horton: > + /* If number of queues specified by application for both Rx and Tx is > + * zero, use driver preferred values. This cannot be done individually > + * as it is valid for either Tx or Rx (but not both) to be zero. > + * If driver does not provide any preferred valued, fall back on > + * EAL defaults. > + */ The fallback could be set in rte_eth_dev_info_get() and call this function instead of calling directly dev_ops->dev_infos_get. It would require to never return -ENOTSUP. At least, some default values should be set in rte_eth_dev_info_get(). > @@ -1029,6 +1048,10 @@ struct rte_eth_dev_info { > /** Configured number of rx/tx queues */ > uint16_t nb_rx_queues; /**< Number of RX queues. */ > uint16_t nb_tx_queues; /**< Number of TX queues. */ > + > + /** Tx/Rx parameter recommendations */ > + struct rte_eth_dev_portconf default_rxportconf; > + struct rte_eth_dev_portconf default_txportconf; Some formatting comments: Usually, there is no blank line in structs. The doxygen comment must apply to each field. Have you checked what is the doxygen output?