From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] examples/multi_process: remove l2fwd fork example Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2018 21:46:54 +0200 Message-ID: <1873240.te3u2aWeyU@xps> References: <20180727185615.25155-1-gage.eads@intel.com> <20180730151000.23024-1-gage.eads@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, anatoly.burakov@intel.com To: Gage Eads Return-path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 845631B569 for ; Sun, 5 Aug 2018 21:51:02 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20180730151000.23024-1-gage.eads@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 30/07/2018 17:10, Gage Eads: > l2fwd_fork relies on a multiprocess model that that DPDK does not support > (calling rte_eal_init() before fork()), in particular in light of recent > EAL changes like the multiproess communication channel. > > This example can mislead users into thinking this is a supported > multiprocess model; hence, this commit removes this example and the > corresponding user guide documentation as well. > > This patch was made following this mailing list discussion: > http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2018-July/108106.html > > Signed-off-by: Gage Eads Applied, thanks