From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] slow data path communication between DPDK
	port and Linux
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 17:31:45 +0100
Message-ID: <1881890.o9IDb9bZGc@xps13>
References: <1453478442-23000-1-git-send-email-ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com (mail-wm0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A119B8F9B
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 17:32:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id b14so140805723wmb.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 22 Jan 2016 08:32:46 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1453478442-23000-1-git-send-email-ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi Ferruh,

Not commenting the implementation, just the method.

2016-01-22 16:00, Ferruh Yigit:
> This is slow data path communication implementation based on existing KNI.
> Difference is: librte_kni converted into a PMD, kdp kernel module is almost
> same except all control path functionality removed and some simplification done.

Is there a chance to submit such kernel module on LKML instead of DPDK?
We should avoid maintaining some out-of-tree modules.