From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: deadline notice
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 13:39:54 +0200
Message-ID: <1910067.s2MvseVWWd@xps13>
References: <2520130.3p9lvqUWmZ@xps13> <159365803.3qspsHhf2U@xps13>
 <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C204A2E551@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: "Iremonger, Bernard" <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wg0-f44.google.com (mail-wg0-f44.google.com [74.125.82.44])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9187E5A9B
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 13:40:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wgbgq6 with SMTP id gq6so3648397wgb.3
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 11 Jun 2015 04:40:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <8CEF83825BEC744B83065625E567D7C204A2E551@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

2015-06-11 10:04, Iremonger, Bernard:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> > Note: [RFC] should be preferred for incomplete patches or trials.
> 
> Should RFC PATCH be retained for v2 and subsequent patches or should RFC be dropped?

If you target an integration of your patch, the RFC keyword must be dropped.