From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] acl: fix invalid results for rule with zero
	priority
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2018 11:56:44 +0200
Message-ID: <1912621.YvyjYky8PI@xps>
References: <1535129226-25510-1-git-send-email-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
To: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811BD2BD5
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sun, 16 Sep 2018 11:56:46 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <1535129226-25510-1-git-send-email-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

24/08/2018 18:47, Konstantin Ananyev:
> If user specifies priority=0 for some of ACL rules
> that can cause rte_acl_classify to return wrong results.
> The reason is that priority zero is used internally for no-match nodes.
> See more details at: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79.
> The simplest way to overcome the issue is just not allow zero
> to be a valid priority for the rule.
> 
> Fixes: dc276b5780c2 ("acl: new library")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>

Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Applied with below title, thanks
	acl: forbid rule with priority zero