From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/11] ethdev: add API to query packet type filling info Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 08:59:14 +0100 Message-ID: <1930479.jzh9uaPbc9@xps13> References: <1451544799-70776-1-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com> <56D474C0.9090300@intel.com> <56D536B3.3080104@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: Panu Matilainen Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com (mail-wm0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5BFA2A6C for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 09:00:51 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id p65so21530339wmp.0 for ; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 00:00:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <56D536B3.3080104@redhat.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-03-01 08:29, Panu Matilainen: > DPDK_2.3 { > global: > > rte_eth_dev_get_ptype_info; > > local: *; > } DPDK_2.2; > > ...but if there are no other reasons to respin the series perhaps Thomas > can fixup that while applying. > > Then there's the actual version, which should optimally be DPDK_16.04 > but that's purely cosmetical. There are a number of patches floating > around with DPDK_2.3 {} and librte_eal actually has one on board, so > clearly the dust from versioning change has not yet settled. Yes it must be 16.04. I've just sent a patch for EAL: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-March/034266.html Thanks