From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] mk: Add rule for installing nic bind files Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 16:52:11 +0100 Message-ID: <1952928.MdIcOR2i3D@xps13> References: <1442608390-12537-1-git-send-email-mario.alfredo.c.arevalo@intel.com> <560E6144.7020607@redhat.com> <59AF69C657FD0841A61C55336867B5B03594B730@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit To: dev@dpdk.org, "Richardson, Bruce" Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com (mail-wm0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 217325683 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 16:53:32 +0100 (CET) Received: by wmuu63 with SMTP id u63so60211229wmu.0 for ; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 07:53:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <59AF69C657FD0841A61C55336867B5B03594B730@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2015-10-02 10:54, Richardson, Bruce: > I think there are better utilities available for determining the core layout > that cpu_layout.py. "lstopo", for one, is much more powerful. Do we want/need > to keep our own script around for that? Good question. Anyone against dropping cpu_layout.py?