From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/19] enic: move enic PMD to drivers/net directory Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 18:52:36 +0200 Message-ID: <1959705.x9H0IzcDjV@xps13> References: <1431450315-13179-1-git-send-email-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <2011983.lTvXhXMBTI@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: "Sujith Sankar (ssujith)" Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com [209.85.212.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4090D56B7 for ; Wed, 20 May 2015 18:53:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wizk4 with SMTP id k4so162215025wiz.1 for ; Wed, 20 May 2015 09:53:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2015-05-20 16:45, Sujith Sankar: > On 20/05/15 9:44 pm, "Thomas Monjalon" wrote: > >2015-05-20 16:04, Richardson, Bruce: > >> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > >> > I think that vnic/ should be renamed to base/ > >> > >> Yes, I was wondering about that. However, this wasn't a driver I was > >>familiar with and its origins, so I left it as-is. > > > >Sujith imported it with this message: > >"VNIC common code partially shared with ENIC kernel mode driver" > >http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-November/008716.html > > Please go ahead with the renaming. > Is this just for uniformity? Is there any other reason? Uniformity and clarity.