From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] bnx2x: SR-IOV VF driver changes to support OOB PF driver Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:34:47 +0200 Message-ID: <1974226.3A89DWaups@xps13> References: <1442018576-19981-1-git-send-email-rasesh.mody@qlogic.com> <1635851.HJqDle7eiu@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Sony Chacko To: Harish Patil Return-path: Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com [209.85.212.180]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66EE5C39C for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:35:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: by wicfx6 with SMTP id fx6so97097961wic.1 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 08:35:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2015-10-21 15:24, Harish Patil: > > > >2015-09-11 17:42, Rasesh Mody: > >> From: Harish Patil > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Harish Patil > > > >Please explain your change a bit more. > > > > > > SR-IOV is supported using bnx2x poll mode driver running as VF driver and > native linux driver running as PF (in host/hypervisor). There is no issue > while running with the PF driver which is at the base version as that of > PMD. However, there is a compatibility issue between newer out-of-box PF > drivers with older VF driver. So the newer VFs would also need to send > BNX2X_VF_TLV_PHYS_PORT_ID (among other TLVs) to differentiate between > newer and older VFs. So the title should be "update VF to support new PF drivers". Please put the detailed explanation in the commit message.