From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 0/8] ethdev: 100G and link speed API
	refactoring
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:23:15 +0200
Message-ID: <1974870.rokCOitPGA@xps13>
References: <1458934950-23333-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
 <1458955640-22951-1-git-send-email-marcdevel@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: Marc Sune <marcdevel@gmail.com>, "Xu, Qian Q" <qian.q.xu@intel.com>, "Xing,
 Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>, "Ananyev,
 Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>, "Lu,
 Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>, "Richardson,
 Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>, "Glynn,
 Michael J" <michael.j.glynn@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com (mail-wm0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A311E214A
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 11:25:08 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wm0-f42.google.com with SMTP id p65so62419000wmp.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 02:25:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <1458955640-22951-1-git-send-email-marcdevel@gmail.com>
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

2016-03-26 02:27, Marc Sune:
> There are still too few tests and reviews, especially for
> autonegotiation with Intel devices (patch #6).
> I would not be surprised to see some bugs in this rework.
> 
> The capabilities must be adapted per device. It can be
> improved in a separate patch.
> 
> It will be integrated in 16.04-rc3.
> Please test and review shortly, thanks!

Still no feedback for e1000 and i40e devices.
Should we consider it is working fine?