From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mohammad Abdul Awal Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] app/testpmd implement VXLAN/NVGRE Encap/Decap Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2018 08:42:10 +0100 Message-ID: <1abcbded-425c-c137-af00-7d8f17805cb9@intel.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Nelio Laranjeiro , dev@dpdk.org, Adrien Mazarguil , Wenzhuo Lu , Jingjing Wu , Bernard Iremonger , Ori Kam , Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from mga12.intel.com (mga12.intel.com [192.55.52.136]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 478DC1BA96 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2018 09:42:19 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Nelio, On 21/06/2018 08:13, Nelio Laranjeiro wrote: > This series adds an easy and maintainable configuration version support for > those two actions for 18.08 by using global variables in testpmd to store the > necessary information for the tunnel encapsulation. Those variables are used > in conjunction of RTE_FLOW_ACTION_{VXLAN,NVGRE}_ENCAP action to create easily > the action for flows. > > A common way to use it: > > set vxlan ipv4 4 4 4 127.0.0.1 128.0.0.1 11:11:11:11:11:11 22:22:22:22:22:22 > flow create 0 ingress pattern end actions vxlan_encap / queue index 0 / end This way we can define only one tunnel for all the flows. This is not a convenient for testing a scenario (e.g. mutiport or switch) with multiple tunnels. Isn't it? Regards, Awal.