From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hemant Agrawal Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] kni: convert license headers to SPDX tags Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 12:16:30 +0530 Message-ID: <1b245a10-1af9-ebca-021c-63680f4e1cc6@nxp.com> References: <20171219000519.53666-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <20180109151229.79325-1-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <4205065.psd1szYZHI@xps> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: To: Ferruh Yigit , Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Received: from NAM02-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sn1nam02on0072.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.36.72]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3456D1B161 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2018 07:46:34 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 1/9/2018 9:00 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 1/9/2018 3:24 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >> 09/01/2018 16:12, Ferruh Yigit: >>> --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/include/exec-env/rte_kni_common.h >>> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/include/exec-env/rte_kni_common.h >>> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (BSD-3-Clause OR LGPL-2.1) */ >>> +/* >>> + * Copyright(c) 2007-2014 Intel Corporation. >>> */ >> >>> --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/kni/kni_net.c >>> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/kni/kni_net.c >>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 >>> +/* >>> + * Copyright(c) 2010-2014 Intel Corporation. >>> */ >> >> Why these empty lines between SPDX and Copyright? > > For kernel module files I followed Linux style, as "//" comments in .c files. > I don't have strong opinion about this... > > I think it is just fine to use the Linux style for kernel module based code. Acked-by: Hemant Agrawal