From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Burakov, Anatoly" Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] eal: don't crash if alarm set fails Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2018 10:34:14 +0100 Message-ID: <1ea01f84-2e79-9f66-e6f0-2b2a542cb26d@intel.com> References: <20180725182019.31518-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20180725182019.31518-4-stephen@networkplumber.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Stephen Hemminger To: Stephen Hemminger , dev@dpdk.org Return-path: Received: from mga18.intel.com (mga18.intel.com [134.134.136.126]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EA99324D for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2018 11:34:18 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20180725182019.31518-4-stephen@networkplumber.org> Content-Language: en-US List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 25-Jul-18 7:20 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > There is no need to call rte_exit and crash the application here; > better to let the application handle the error itself. > > Remove the gratuitous profanity which would be visible if > the rte_exit was still there. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger > --- Oops, this was a "debug" message i accidentally left in :( My apologies! -- Thanks, Anatoly