From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] lpm: extend ip4 next_hop and add config structure Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 17:35:20 +0100 Message-ID: <2011283.cuAp1JmmEa@xps13> References: <1454069573-12059-1-git-send-email-michalx.kobylinski@intel.com> <2044358.OMRF2VQKlE@xps13> <987EE72691933347B9F0B5C19E71B5BB1F04159F@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org To: "Kobylinski, MichalX" Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f45.google.com (mail-wm0-f45.google.com [74.125.82.45]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23A446CD0 for ; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 17:36:57 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f45.google.com with SMTP id p65so88042365wmp.1 for ; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 08:36:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <987EE72691933347B9F0B5C19E71B5BB1F04159F@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 2016-03-02 16:23, Kobylinski, MichalX: > From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 4:29 PM > > Is it possible to split the changes in next_hop and config structure? > > It is possible. Do you mean to put config structure into seperate patch-set? If it makes sense, yes. I don't know how strongly the changes are tied. If possible, it's better to have progressive changes to make the patches easier to understand.