From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cyril Cressent Subject: Re: pci_unbind.py failure Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2013 16:04:37 +0000 Message-ID: <20131105160437.GK26200@debian> References: <20131105122319.GA26200@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org" To: Jyotiswarup Raiturkar Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 08:01:06PM +0530, Jyotiswarup Raiturkar wrote: > Thanks for the quick reply. I saw some definitions of e1000_phy_82579 hence > I thought (hoped) the NIC would be supported. I will try to run my dpdk app > inside a VM with an emulated e1000 NIC (just to test the code ..). As a general rule, even if you find references to a NIC in the poll mode drivers, if it's not listed in lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_pci_dev_ids.h then consider the NIC as not supported. Good luck with the VM, Cyril