From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: Question on the Ring Library Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 13:51:25 -0800 Message-ID: <20131204135125.0fb7bf3f@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> References: <20131204132548.05a151fe@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org" To: Sambath Kumar Balasubramanian Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 13:47:10 -0800 Sambath Kumar Balasubramanian wrote: > Thanks Stephen. I was going to do prototype something similar (not doing > the wakeup inline but using a background thread) > and is it a worthwhile effort to move this as a feature of the RTE ring or > is it best left at the application level. > I prefer that RTE ring stays as simple as possible. If you need a higher level abstraction, built it yourself