From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [memnic PATCH] pmd: use memory barrier function instead of asm volatile Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2014 14:08:15 +0100 Message-ID: <201402041408.15739.thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> References: <1390579157-23890-1-git-send-email-olivier.matz@6wind.com> <7F861DC0615E0C47A872E6F3C5FCDDBD0102D11D@BPXM14GP.gisp.nec.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org To: Olivier Matz Return-path: In-Reply-To: <7F861DC0615E0C47A872E6F3C5FCDDBD0102D11D-ZmjkEB1lVlLt6d3pZDjeaEtBU8KWyXPq@public.gmane.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" 30/01/2014 12:42, Hiroshi Shimamoto: > > Use the DPDK specific function rte_mb() instead of > > the GCC statement asm volatile ("" ::: "memory"). > > > > Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz > > Yes, that's preferred for DPDK, I think. > Looks okay to me. Applied, thanks. -- Thomas