From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Wright Subject: Re: Ethtool support in DPDK pmd Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 13:37:35 -0700 Message-ID: <20140602203735.GL8384@x220.localdomain> References: <5D695A7F6F10504DBD9B9187395A21797D0CF42B@ORSMSX112.amr.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org" To: HS Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" * HS (hyunseok-EkmVulN54Sk@public.gmane.org) wrote: > Thanks for your reply. > > Sure KNI can offer ethtool interface. But suppose I am already running a > DPDK application on a physical port, but at the same time I want to control > the port with ethtool like interface. How could I do that? HS, I might be missing something there, but with the current model of usermode device drivers I don't think this is simple. If drivers stayed in kernel and kernel drivers exposed a mechansim for registering application dma buffers for dpdk apps, then ethtool would simply work as-is. thanks, -chris