From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Neil Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] eal / bonding pmd cleanup Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 09:04:26 -0400 Message-ID: <20140922130426.GE25406@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> References: <1409062338-26477-1-git-send-email-david.marchand@6wind.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org" To: David Marchand Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 01:02:08PM +0200, David Marchand wrote: > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 3:05 PM, David Marchand > wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 4:12 PM, David Marchand > > wrote: > > > >> This patchset reworks the bonding pmd so that we don't need to modify the > >> eal > >> for this pmd to work. > >> > >> Basically, the arguments parsed at bond_init are stored in the bond > >> private > >> structure to be used at dev_configure time. > >> If no argument are present, we suppose that the bonding api has been > >> called. > >> > > > > I did not get any comment on these patches. > > Anyone ? > > > > The idea here is to keep pmd stuff in the pmds and avoid polluting the eal. > > > > ping Sorry, it was on my todo list and it kept getting pushed back. I like the change, its makes great sense and does proper isolation of the PMD. Acked-by: Neil Horman > > > -- > David Marchand >