From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Hall Subject: Re: rc1 / call for review Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 14:33:41 -0700 Message-ID: <20140929213341.GA589@mhcomputing.net> References: <1963310.3iizrFVzmj@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1963310.3iizrFVzmj@xps13> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 10:23:58PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > - mbuf rework > - logs rework > - some eal cleanups Hi Thomas, I was curious, did we happen to know if any of these three changes affected the external API's much? It would help us get some idea what to test and where to look, since mbuf, logs, and eal are probably the three most popular parts of DPDK for us app hackers to interact with regularly. Thanks, Matthew.