From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Neil Horman Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] librte_reorder: new reorder library Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 18:55:41 -0400 Message-ID: <20141008225540.GA15850@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> References: <3AEA2BF9852C6F48A459DA490692831FE21954@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com> <20141008224111.GC29243@mhcomputing.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org" To: Matthew Hall Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141008224111.GC29243-Hv3ogNYU3JfZZajBQzqCxQ@public.gmane.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 03:41:11PM -0700, Matthew Hall wrote: > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 09:33:06AM +0000, Pattan, Reshma wrote: > > To be used along with distributor library. Next version of distributor are > > planned to distribute incoming packets to all worker cores irrespective of > > the flow type. In this case to ensure in order delivery of the packets at > > output side reorder library will used by the tx end. > > Hello, > > I am trying to understand, why is usage of the RSS options on the RX Queues > insufficient to keep the packets ordered per-flow on the TX Queues? > I think because there is a possibility that multiple workers may be used for a single tx queue. Neil > Thanks, > Matthew. >