From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Neil Horman Subject: Re: Added Spinlock to l3fwd-vf example to prevent race conditioning Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 09:47:45 -0500 Message-ID: <20141210144745.GC17040@localhost.localdomain> References: <1404818184-29388-1-git-send-email-danielx.t.mrzyglod@intel.com> <20141208144545.GD3237@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org" To: "Wodkowski, PawelX" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 08:18:36AM +0000, Wodkowski, PawelX wrote: > > Though, that said, doesn't it seem to anyone else like serialization of enqueue > > to a port should be the responsibility of the library, not the application? > > > > Neil > > From my knowledge it is an application responsibility to serialize access to > queue on particular port. > I understand thats the way it currently is, I'm advocating for the fact that it should not be. Neil > Pawel >