From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bruce Richardson Subject: Re: [PATCH] testpmd: limit port mask bits to RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 13:50:06 +0000 Message-ID: <20141216135006.GA11716@bricha3-MOBL3> References: <1418736437-30585-1-git-send-email-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <2281526.Jgy67gTqhP@xps13> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org To: Thomas Monjalon Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2281526.Jgy67gTqhP@xps13> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 02:40:09PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2014-12-16 13:27, Bruce Richardson: > > The port mask parsing in testpmd allowed up to 64 bits to be processed, > > even if RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS is set to a max of 32. Fix this by only > > processing up to min(RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS,64) bits of the mask. > [...] > > - for (i = 0; i < 64; i++) { > > + for (i = 0; i < 64 && i < RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS; i++) { > > Why not use RTE_MIN? > > -- > Thomas Because this works equally well, and the change is simpler and clearer IMHO. However, if you feel very strongly about it, I can change it to use RTE_MIN instead. :-) /Bruce